From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932672AbaDIIDr (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Apr 2014 04:03:47 -0400 Received: from nat28.tlf.novell.com ([130.57.49.28]:57346 "EHLO nat28.tlf.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750814AbaDIIDn convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Apr 2014 04:03:43 -0400 Message-Id: <53451AFB0200007800006FC9@nat28.tlf.novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 14.0.0 Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 09:03:39 +0100 From: "Jan Beulich" To: Cc: , , , "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" , , Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH 2/2] xen/pvhvm: Support more than 32 VCPUs when migrating. References: <1396859560.22845.4.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <1396977950-8789-1-git-send-email-konrad@kernel.org> <1396977950-8789-3-git-send-email-konrad@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <1396977950-8789-3-git-send-email-konrad@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>> On 08.04.14 at 19:25, wrote: > + /* Only Xen 4.5 and higher supports this. */ > + if (HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op(VCPUOP_is_up, smp_processor_id(), NULL) == -ENOSYS) > + vcpuops = false; Did you mean to say "for HVM guests" in the comment? And of course the comment could quickly become stale if we backported the Xen side change to e.g. 4.4.1. Jan