From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Deepak S Subject: Re: [PATCH 30/71] drm/i915/chv: Enable PM interrupts when we in CHV turbo initialize sequence. Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 21:03:39 +0530 Message-ID: <534AAE53.10608@linux.intel.com> References: <1397039349-10639-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> <1397039349-10639-31-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> <20140409130654.GA4573@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com> <53459CAD.9060102@linux.intel.com> <20140409223304.GA4425@bwidawsk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666416E0EF for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 08:33:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140409223304.GA4425@bwidawsk.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: Ben Widawsky Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Thursday 10 April 2014 04:03 AM, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:47:01AM +0530, Deepak S wrote: >> On Wednesday 09 April 2014 06:36 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 01:28:28PM +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote: >>>> +static void gen8_enable_rps_interrupts(struct drm_device *dev) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; >>>> + >>>> + /* Clear out any stale interrupts first */ >>>> + spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock); >>>> + WARN_ON(dev_priv->rps.pm_iir); >>>> + I915_WRITE(GEN8_GT_IIR(2), I915_READ(GEN8_GT_IIR(2))); >>>> + dev_priv->pm_irq_mask &= ~GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS; >>>> + I915_WRITE(GEN8_GT_IMR(2), dev_priv->pm_irq_mask); >>>> + spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock); >>>> + >>>> + I915_WRITE(GEN8_GT_IER(2), GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS); >>>> + /* only unmask PM interrupts we need. Mask all others. */ >>>> + I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK, ~GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS); >>> PMINTRMSK handling is now a part of set_rps (and so this line is >>> redundant). >>> -Chris >> Thanks Chris. I will make the changes based on the current nightly code >> >> > I think my patch kept up with this, but I too am not sure. In either > case feel free to reuse, copy, or review that one. > > I don't think I've mailed out the very latest version, but I am pretty > sure I mailed out after the last painful rebase (and it's tested on > BDW). > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~bwidawsk/drm-intel/commit/?h=bdw-rc6&id=80fbe001fc4ba38c41db3cec177c9157b2613c3c > Thanks Ben. I will reuse the patches submitted by you