From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <535110C3.40500@xenomai.org> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:47:15 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7dad12a6.21b0a.14574613527.Coremail.ericvic@163.com> In-Reply-To: <7dad12a6.21b0a.14574613527.Coremail.ericvic@163.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] imx6q xenomai ipipe-3.0-imx6q List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?5bWM5YWl5byP5bel56iL5biI?= Cc: huang.c.h@lynuc.cn, liu.h.f@lynuc.cn, "xenomai@xenomai.org" On 04/18/2014 12:28 PM, 嵌入式工程师 wrote: > > > I do the same on the imx53 with imx6 test, in the process of > real-time task to run the same operation content, start the qt deform > demo and copy large file to memory, in 250 us the latency on imx6 > board began to accumulate, lost real-time, but latency on the imx53 > only value within 20 us. I do not run anyother rt task on my below > test: Looking at your code, it seems your problem (if I understand correctly), is that a series of memcpy and memset takes a long time to execute when non real-time activities are given an opportunity to thrash the cache. Am I understanding correctly? -- Gilles.