From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarkko Nikula Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: rt5640: Add minimal support for RT5642 Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:47:51 +0300 Message-ID: <535DF997.6080700@linux.intel.com> References: <1397701446-11977-1-git-send-email-bardliao@realtek.com> <535ADCD2.8050804@wwwdotorg.org> <20140426002234.GS12304@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5B5261647 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 08:47:55 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20140426002234.GS12304@sirena.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown , Stephen Warren Cc: oder_chiou@realtek.com, bardliao@realtek.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, flove@realtek.com List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 04/26/2014 03:22 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 04:08:18PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 04/16/2014 08:24 PM, bardliao@realtek.com wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula >> Is this derived from Jarkko's patch? If so, shouldn't he be listed as >> the author, not you? If it wasn't, then presumably his S-o-b line >> shouldn't be in the patch description. > It was derived but edited; I did check with Jarkko that he was OK before > applying. It was ok to me since derivate had more information (device ID bit descriptions) than my patch. -- Jarkko