From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rajendra Nayak Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: dts: Add support for DRA72x family of devices Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:25:37 +0530 Message-ID: <535E1789.5020001@ti.com> References: <1398333987-19454-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <201404241513.54380.arnd@arndb.de> <535DF092.7000307@ti.com> <5761706.QaRvAizEZ2@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5761706.QaRvAizEZ2@wuerfel> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, nm@ti.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, bcousson@baylibre.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Monday 28 April 2014 02:20 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 28 April 2014 11:39:22 Rajendra Nayak wrote: >> >> DRA742 EVM: Software Developement Board for DRA742 >> compatible = "ti,dra7-evm", "ti,dra742", "ti,dra74", "ti,dra7" >> DRA722 EVM: Software Development Board for DRA722 >> compatible = "ti,dra72-evm", "ti,dra722", "ti,dra72", "ti,dra7" >> >> I was also calling the .dtsi files as dra72x.dtsi and dra74x.dtsi, do you suggest I call >> them dra742.dtsi and dra722.dtsi instead? Just that if we end up with a dra745 which is >> fully compatible with dra742, as you mentioned above, we would be using a dra742.dtsi for a dra745 >> device which could be a little confusing. > > For the file names, wildcards are ok. Alternatively you could have > a dra745.dtsi that does nothing but include dra752.dtsi and override > the compatible string (if there is one to start with). Okay, thanks. > > Arnd > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rnayak@ti.com (Rajendra Nayak) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:25:37 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: dts: Add support for DRA72x family of devices In-Reply-To: <5761706.QaRvAizEZ2@wuerfel> References: <1398333987-19454-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <201404241513.54380.arnd@arndb.de> <535DF092.7000307@ti.com> <5761706.QaRvAizEZ2@wuerfel> Message-ID: <535E1789.5020001@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday 28 April 2014 02:20 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 28 April 2014 11:39:22 Rajendra Nayak wrote: >> >> DRA742 EVM: Software Developement Board for DRA742 >> compatible = "ti,dra7-evm", "ti,dra742", "ti,dra74", "ti,dra7" >> DRA722 EVM: Software Development Board for DRA722 >> compatible = "ti,dra72-evm", "ti,dra722", "ti,dra72", "ti,dra7" >> >> I was also calling the .dtsi files as dra72x.dtsi and dra74x.dtsi, do you suggest I call >> them dra742.dtsi and dra722.dtsi instead? Just that if we end up with a dra745 which is >> fully compatible with dra742, as you mentioned above, we would be using a dra742.dtsi for a dra745 >> device which could be a little confusing. > > For the file names, wildcards are ok. Alternatively you could have > a dra745.dtsi that does nothing but include dra752.dtsi and override > the compatible string (if there is one to start with). Okay, thanks. > > Arnd >