From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 44905E0096C; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 08:00:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [147.11.146.13 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Greylist: delayed 9099 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at yocto-www; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 08:00:52 PDT Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC010E003C7 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 08:00:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s3UCT848013839 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 30 Apr 2014 05:29:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.56.48] (128.224.56.48) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.169.1; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 05:29:08 -0700 Message-ID: <5360EC86.1070308@windriver.com> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 08:28:54 -0400 From: Bruce Ashfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neuer User , References: <535E5198.60709@windriver.com> <535E54BB.7060701@windriver.com> <535E59A1.1080808@windriver.com> <5360CF6B.1020007@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <5360CF6B.1020007@gmx.de> Subject: Re: Kernel config fragments are not applied X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:00:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 14-04-30 06:24 AM, Neuer User wrote: > Hi Bruce > > Have you got any further? Your timing is good. I was preeempted by another issue yesterday, but I have the fsl-imx layers cloned and am about to start a build. I'll send a follow up when I know more. Bruce > > I currently use a "defconfig" replacement, but honestly, it feels very > dumb. Fragments seem to be much smarter to combine and test different > configurations. > > Cheers > > Michael > > Am 28.04.2014 15:37, schrieb Bruce Ashfield: >> On 14-04-28 09:35 AM, Neuer User wrote: >>> Am 28.04.2014 15:16, schrieb Bruce Ashfield: >>>> It all depends on how adventurous you are today :) Using a defconfig >>>> will work, and you can generate one without much trouble. Using >>>> fragments will allow you to keep your changes separate from the >>>> baseline configuration, but you'll need to tweak the recipe .. which >>>> always carries a risk of some unexpected side effects. >>>> >>>> I'm around to help regardless of which way you chose. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Bruce >>>> >>> >>> Well, I looked at the linux-yocto file and tried a couple of >>> combinations in my bbappend. All of them geenrated lots of different >>> errors. >> >> If you send me pointers to your bblayers and local.conf settings, I'll >> run a build to see what happens here as well. >> >> I'm always interested in tracking these down regardless. >> >> Bruce >> >>> >>> e.g. I used: >>> >>> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-${PV}:" >>> >>> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_cubox-i = "(cubox-i)" >>> >>> SRC_URI += "file://videoin.cfg" >>> >>> addtask kernel_configme before do_configure after do_patch >>> >>> # Pick up shared functions >>> inherit kernel >>> inherit kernel-yocto >>> #require linux-dtb.inc >>> >>> # extra tasks >>> addtask kernel_configcheck after do_configure before do_compile >>> >>> >>> The error messages are too long to include here :-/ >>> >>> Guess, it is probably best to go the defconfig way. >>> >> > >