From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 2CF50E0098E; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:44:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [147.11.146.13 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E0CE0096C for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:44:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s3UIiWv8017883 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:44:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.56.48] (128.224.56.48) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.169.1; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:44:32 -0700 Message-ID: <53614482.8010102@windriver.com> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:44:18 -0400 From: Bruce Ashfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neuer User , References: <535E5198.60709@windriver.com> <535E54BB.7060701@windriver.com> <535E59A1.1080808@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Kernel config fragments are not applied X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 18:44:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 14-04-28 09:54 AM, Neuer User wrote: > Am 28.04.2014 15:37, schrieb Bruce Ashfield: >> >> If you send me pointers to your bblayers and local.conf settings, I'll >> run a build to see what happens here as well. >> >> I'm always interested in tracking these down regardless. >> >> Bruce >> > > Testing this should be pretty straightforward, if see that correctly. > > Just init the repo with yocto master-next. Then export MACHINE=cubox-i. > > My layer has: > > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-cubox-i_3.0.35.bbappend: Can you send me your bblayers out of band ? I'm using meta-fsl-arm and meta-fsl-arm-extra to get a build going, and running into expansion errors in the kernel recipes. Rather than hunt around more than necessary, I'll check against your layers. Bruce > > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-${PV}:" > > inherit kernel > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_cubox-i = "(cubox-i)" > > SRC_URI += "file://videoin.cfg" > > > And in recipes-kernel/linux/linux-cubox-i-3.0.35/videoin.cfg: > > CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7180=y > > (for a test this should suffice) > > Then after a "bitbake linux-cubix-i -c configure" you can grep ADV7180 > in tmp/work/cubox_i-poky-linux-gnueabi/linux-cubox-i/3.0.35-r0/git/.config > > Normally it is "=n", now it should be "=y". > > Thanks > > Michael >