From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 641A960043; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Nov 2015 14:08:15 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,314,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="602816895" Received: from klim2-mobl4.gar.corp.intel.com (HELO peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com) ([10.255.171.118]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Nov 2015 14:08:10 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org, Alexander Kanavin Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:08:08 +1300 Message-ID: <5364807.1EKch11jUs@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.14.9 (Linux/4.1.10-100.fc21.x86_64; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <5649AF3D.2020106@linux.intel.com> References: <58488.10.252.13.130.1447346734.squirrel@linux.intel.com> <5649AACB.6070204@opendreambox.org> <5649AF3D.2020106@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: volunteers for meta-qt4 repo maintenance? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:08:14 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Monday 16 November 2015 12:26:05 Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On 11/16/2015 12:07 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > >> Making a separate repository with this layer is even more disruptive, > >> and complicates administration and maintenance. I'm not going to handle > >> those. So I'll make a meta-qt4 layer under meta-oe, and it's fine if > >> there is no official maintainer or ongoing build testing for it at least > >> until someone volunteers to pick it up. > > > > Basically everyone agreed on moving qt4 to its own repo. And your > > conclusion is to ignore that and move qt4 to meta-openembedded, already > > expecting bitrot? > > Are you willing to be the maintainer of that separate repo? So far no > one has stepped up for this job. In this situation, it's better to keep > the recipes under meta-openembedded tree and mark them as unmaintained. > > I'll ask this explicitly - any volunteers for a separate meta-qt4 > repository and layer maintenance? Put my name against it if you need a name - no promises on how active I'll be though. I will definitely volunteer to do the initial move-out and repo creation so you wouldn't need to do anything. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 641A960043; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Nov 2015 14:08:15 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,314,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="602816895" Received: from klim2-mobl4.gar.corp.intel.com (HELO peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com) ([10.255.171.118]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Nov 2015 14:08:10 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org, Alexander Kanavin Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:08:08 +1300 Message-ID: <5364807.1EKch11jUs@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.14.9 (Linux/4.1.10-100.fc21.x86_64; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <5649AF3D.2020106@linux.intel.com> References: <58488.10.252.13.130.1447346734.squirrel@linux.intel.com> <5649AACB.6070204@opendreambox.org> <5649AF3D.2020106@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [OE-core] volunteers for meta-qt4 repo maintenance? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:08:14 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Monday 16 November 2015 12:26:05 Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On 11/16/2015 12:07 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > >> Making a separate repository with this layer is even more disruptive, > >> and complicates administration and maintenance. I'm not going to handle > >> those. So I'll make a meta-qt4 layer under meta-oe, and it's fine if > >> there is no official maintainer or ongoing build testing for it at least > >> until someone volunteers to pick it up. > > > > Basically everyone agreed on moving qt4 to its own repo. And your > > conclusion is to ignore that and move qt4 to meta-openembedded, already > > expecting bitrot? > > Are you willing to be the maintainer of that separate repo? So far no > one has stepped up for this job. In this situation, it's better to keep > the recipes under meta-openembedded tree and mark them as unmaintained. > > I'll ask this explicitly - any volunteers for a separate meta-qt4 > repository and layer maintenance? Put my name against it if you need a name - no promises on how active I'll be though. I will definitely volunteer to do the initial move-out and repo creation so you wouldn't need to do anything. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre