From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: Xen Platform QoS design discussion Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 08:55:28 +0100 Message-ID: <5368B190020000780000F2FA@mail.emea.novell.com> References: <40776A41FC278F40B59438AD47D147A9119F3FEA@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <1398877340.5166.13.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <40776A41FC278F40B59438AD47D147A9119F42A2@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <5363804B020000780000E604@mail.emea.novell.com> <40776A41FC278F40B59438AD47D147A9119F4EF4@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <5363AE54020000780000E7A2@mail.emea.novell.com> <40776A41FC278F40B59438AD47D147A9119FE6BB@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <40776A41FC278F40B59438AD47D147A9119FE6BB@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Dongxiao Xu Cc: "Andrew Cooper(andrew.cooper3@citrix.com)" , Ian Campbell , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 06.05.14 at 03:40, wrote: > Since there is no further comments, I suppose we all agreed on making the > hypercall per-domain and use data copying mechanism between hypervisor and > Dom0 tool stack? I think Andrew wasn't really in agreement with this, and I also think the ball is in your court to tell us whether indeed the prevalent usage model would benefit from that choice of yours. Considering just OpenStack, as I said before, seems a little narrow minded to me. That said, I'm neverthtless not really opposed to the per-domain- copying model. Jan