From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [V10 PATCH 0/4] pvh dom0 patches... Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 09:09:28 +0100 Message-ID: <5368B4D8020000780000F31B@mail.emea.novell.com> References: <1398820008-9005-1-git-send-email-mukesh.rathor@oracle.com> <5361049B.7040409@citrix.com> <20140430111216.2bef8e60@mantra.us.oracle.com> <20140430181923.68d75467@mantra.us.oracle.com> <53637BF3.2000502@citrix.com> <20140502170114.7ec2a9e6@mantra.us.oracle.com> <53675166.30400@citrix.com> <20140505172858.4c6c3f0a@mantra.us.oracle.com> <53688B84.8090607@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WhaRU-0007BJ-30 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 08:09:36 +0000 In-Reply-To: <53688B84.8090607@citrix.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Roger=20Pau=20Monn=C3=A9?= , Mukesh Rathor Cc: George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, keir.xen@gmail.com, tim@xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 06.05.14 at 09:13, wrote: > Sure, that makes a lot of sense. What I was wondering is why don't we > move the logic of "xen_populate_chunk" into Xen code itself, like we do > for the holes part. If Xen is in charge of doing the holes in the memory > map, it should also take care of adding those pages back to the end of > the memory map, what we do right now is very awkward IMHO. Indeed. Jan