From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [V10 PATCH 0/4] pvh dom0 patches... Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 07:37:21 +0100 Message-ID: <536B424102000078000104AB@mail.emea.novell.com> References: <1398820008-9005-1-git-send-email-mukesh.rathor@oracle.com> <5361049B.7040409@citrix.com> <20140430111216.2bef8e60@mantra.us.oracle.com> <20140430181923.68d75467@mantra.us.oracle.com> <53637BF3.2000502@citrix.com> <20140502170114.7ec2a9e6@mantra.us.oracle.com> <53675166.30400@citrix.com> <20140505172858.4c6c3f0a@mantra.us.oracle.com> <53688B84.8090607@citrix.com> <20140506180053.7c6da000@mantra.us.oracle.com> <536A01D8020000780000FB15@mail.emea.novell.com> <20140507170427.53580df0@mantra.us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WiHxM-0001dU-Gl for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 08 May 2014 06:37:24 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20140507170427.53580df0@mantra.us.oracle.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Mukesh Rathor Cc: George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, keir.xen@gmail.com, tim@xen.org, roger.pau@citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 08.05.14 at 02:04, wrote: > On Wed, 07 May 2014 08:50:16 +0100 > "Jan Beulich" wrote: > >> >>> On 07.05.14 at 03:00, wrote: >> > As Konrad points out, there are other issues with that part of the >> > code. So, IMO, we should wait and address that altogether for both >> > PV and PVH, and for now leave this as is. >> >> I'm fine either way, as long as you and Roger can reach agreement. >> I still tend towards considering Roger's position the right one as a >> mid/long term route. > > Ok, will let Roger drive that on xen, and I'll look at linux side. But > since his patch is incremental on top of mine, I find request reasonable > that my next version V12 be checked in if no issues, or at least > construct_dom0 patch which is sitting reviewed for over 6 months now. I would have long committed it if you had chased up Tim's ack on it. I'm not going to do that for you, there's enough other patches that need taking care of. Jan