From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/34] xen/common: tmem: Remove dumb check in do_tmem_destroy_pool [and 2 more messages] Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 11:47:10 +0100 Message-ID: <537F434E0200007800015501@mail.emea.novell.com> References: <1395766541-23979-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> <1395766541-23979-10-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> <5331C583.9090001@citrix.com> <5331C86D.6070306@linaro.org> <20140403180616.GB24597@andromeda.dapyr.net> <21374.8026.596097.191502@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <537F01E402000078000152A1@mail.emea.novell.com> <21375.8637.127803.656937@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Wnn0L-0007V9-Tx for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 10:47:14 +0000 In-Reply-To: <21375.8637.127803.656937@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: ian.campbell@citrix.com, Andrew Cooper , Julien Grall , tim@xen.org, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 23.05.14 at 12:23, wrote: > Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 09/34] xen/common: tmem: Remove > dumb check in do_tmem_destroy_pool [and 2 more messages]"): >> On 22.05.14 at 18:01, wrote: >> > On 25/03/14 16:55, Julien Grall wrote: >> > This patch (committed to staging as ac0f56a2) has turned up in my >> > backport list somehow, even though (a) it wouldn't be my >> > responsibility as it's a hypervisor patch and (b) I can find no trace >> > of it in my mailbox to explain why. >> > >> > My backport list only records the identity of the patch and the date >> > when I added it to the list (8th of April 2014 in this case). I >> > normally use my email to find out why. >> >> Perhaps just a one-off in picking commit IDs from git log output? > > I thought of that but the adjacent commits are not candidates either. > >> > Anyway, I thought I'd email Jan as stable maintainer to decide what to >> > do about it. I'm removing it from my own backport list. >> >> I see no reason to apply any tmem patches to stable trees until >> tmem's status changes back to supported, or unless being urged >> by the tmem maintainer. > > Right. But I saw you applied it to all trees already... Jan