From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the s390 tree
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 08:31:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <537b8dd9-798e-f5d2-2595-cd0adfd1123c@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180509142154.73ff5772@canb.auug.org.au>
On 05/09/2018 06:21 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, 8 May 2018 10:26:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:
>>
>> arch/s390/net/bpf_jit.S
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>> de5cb6eb514e ("s390: use expoline thunks in the BPF JIT")
>>
>> from the s390 tree and commit:
>>
>> e1cf4befa297 ("bpf, s390x: remove ld_abs/ld_ind")
>>
>> from the bpf-next tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (I just removed the file as the latter does) and can
>> carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
>> concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
>> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may
>> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
>> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
> This is now a conflict between the net-next and s390 trees.
Right, bpf-next merged as usual into net-next two days ago; so same
resolution applies.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-09 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-08 0:26 linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the s390 tree Stephen Rothwell
2018-05-08 8:19 ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-05-09 4:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-05-09 6:31 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=537b8dd9-798e-f5d2-2595-cd0adfd1123c@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.