From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Figa Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 Resend 1/2] ARM: EXYNOS: Update secondary boot addr for secure mode Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 20:47:02 +0200 Message-ID: <5388D226.7000706@gmail.com> References: <1401250382-24046-1-git-send-email-sachin.kamat@linaro.org> <5388CBB9.1050003@suse.de> <5388D129.6000706@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f170.google.com ([74.125.82.170]:58417 "EHLO mail-we0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754324AbaE3SrS (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2014 14:47:18 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id u57so2510950wes.1 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 11:47:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5388D129.6000706@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Kukjin Kim , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rbe?= =?ISO-8859-15?Q?r?= Cc: Sachin Kamat , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, tushar.behera@linaro.org On 30.05.2014 20:42, Kukjin Kim wrote: > On 05/31/14 03:19, Andreas F=E4rber wrote: >> Am 28.05.2014 06:13, schrieb Sachin Kamat: >>> Almost all Exynos-series of SoCs that run in secure mode don't need >>> additional offset for every CPU, with Exynos4412 being the only >>> exception. >>> >>> Tested on Origen-Quad (Exynos4412) and Arndale-Octa (Exynos5420). >>> >>> While at it, fix the coding style (space around *). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat >>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera >>> --- >>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c | 9 +++++++-- >>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> Fixes ODROID-XU (Exynos5410) as well - thought it had been a prereq = to >> applying the 5410 patches... >> >> Tested-by: Andreas F=E4rber >> > Andreas, thanks for your test :-) >=20 > Sachin, How about exynos4210, 5250, 5260 and 5440?... > I need to check again, honestly I don't remember all of Exynos SoCs' > different things ;-) Then will apply into fixes for 3.16. Exynos4210 doesn't use secure firmware, at least on any board supported in mainline. Not sure about those Exynos5 models, but the only boards supported in mainline with firmware node in DT are based on Exynos4412 or Exynos5410. Best regards, Tomasz From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 20:47:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 Resend 1/2] ARM: EXYNOS: Update secondary boot addr for secure mode In-Reply-To: <5388D129.6000706@samsung.com> References: <1401250382-24046-1-git-send-email-sachin.kamat@linaro.org> <5388CBB9.1050003@suse.de> <5388D129.6000706@samsung.com> Message-ID: <5388D226.7000706@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 30.05.2014 20:42, Kukjin Kim wrote: > On 05/31/14 03:19, Andreas F?rber wrote: >> Am 28.05.2014 06:13, schrieb Sachin Kamat: >>> Almost all Exynos-series of SoCs that run in secure mode don't need >>> additional offset for every CPU, with Exynos4412 being the only >>> exception. >>> >>> Tested on Origen-Quad (Exynos4412) and Arndale-Octa (Exynos5420). >>> >>> While at it, fix the coding style (space around *). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat >>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera >>> --- >>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c | 9 +++++++-- >>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> Fixes ODROID-XU (Exynos5410) as well - thought it had been a prereq to >> applying the 5410 patches... >> >> Tested-by: Andreas F?rber >> > Andreas, thanks for your test :-) > > Sachin, How about exynos4210, 5250, 5260 and 5440?... > I need to check again, honestly I don't remember all of Exynos SoCs' > different things ;-) Then will apply into fixes for 3.16. Exynos4210 doesn't use secure firmware, at least on any board supported in mainline. Not sure about those Exynos5 models, but the only boards supported in mainline with firmware node in DT are based on Exynos4412 or Exynos5410. Best regards, Tomasz