From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vijay Purushothaman <vijay.a.purushothaman@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: Force PSR exit by
 inactivating it.
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 16:40:47 +0530
Message-ID: <538DAD37.1000605@intel.com>
References: <1400199190-2424-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
 <1400199190-2424-7-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
 <20140516102354.GE22332@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
 <CABVU7+vERMbRXecS+-j6e+aD9Xb8vaVmuLRPqMQwNcd+BomAag@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88])
 by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F22B46E2B2
 for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Tue,  3 Jun 2014 04:11:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABVU7+vERMbRXecS+-j6e+aD9Xb8vaVmuLRPqMQwNcd+BomAag@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "Intel-gfx" <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On 5/16/2014 10:12 PM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
> <mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>> wrote:
>
>     On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:13:05PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>      > The perfect solution for psr_exit is the hardware tracking the
>     changes and
>      > doing the psr exit by itself. This scenario works for HSW and BDW
>     with some
>      > environments like Gnome and Wayland.
>      >
>      > However there are many other scenarios that this isn't true.
>     Mainly one right
>      > now is KDE users on HSW and BDW with PSR on. User would miss many
>     screen
>      > updates. For instances any key typed could be seen only when
>     mouse cursor is
>      > moved. So this patch introduces the ability of trigger PSR exit
>     on kernel side
>      > on some common cases that.
>
>     You know that userspace has been waiting for a PSR flag for over a year
>     now so that it can use the more efficient rendering paths when it makes
>     sense.
>
>
> yeah... this item is lingering on my to do list... but reaching a point
> where I won't be able to continue postponing it ;)
>
>> What happened to the front buffer tracking?
>
> What front buffer tracking? hehe
> I'm wondering about this since I started looking to fbc and psr and
> could never find a reliable way.
>
FBC should cover most of the scenarios except cursor planes.. When ever 
cursor planes are enabled you can fall back to s/w controlled exit path.

If you can elaborate on the exact issue that you are facing with FBC and 
PSR may be i can help..

Thanks,
Vijay

>
>     -Chris
>
>     --
>     Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
>
>
>
>
> --
> Rodrigo Vivi
> Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>