From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars Kurth Subject: Re: [Need Input] (informal) Automotive PV drivers subproject request Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 14:14:28 +0100 Message-ID: <5395B334.6040403@xen.org> References: <538F2BA7.8060806@xen.org> <1401899758.6866.44.camel@Solace> <1402045192.29759.31.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <5391BC9C.40503@xen.org> <1402067321.1313.95.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <1402092104.29895.18.camel@Abyss> <5395A7B7.4080203@xen.org> <1402317019.21938.12.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Reply-To: lars.kurth@xen.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1402317019.21938.12.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Artem Mygaiev , Stefano Stabellini , Dario Faggioli , Ian Jackson , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , David Vrabel , Andrii Tseglytskyi List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 09/06/2014 13:30, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 13:25 +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: >> On 09/06/2014 11:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >>> On Sat, 7 Jun 2014, Dario Faggioli wrote: >>>>>>> Officially supported Xen Project repositories should only depend on >>>>>>> *upstreams* (Xen, Linux, ...). As we are talking about >>>>>>> git://xenbits.xen.org/pvdrivers.git here (as suggested by Aertem), >>>>>>> whatever is in that repo (owned by a subproject) should build and work >>>>>>> with vanilla Xen and Linux. >>>>>> Is this pvdrivers.git going to be a descendent (e.g. a git clone) of >>>>>> xen.git? Or is it a fresh repository which contains this new set of >>>>>> drivers which do not have a home in xen.git? >>>>> pvdrivers.git shall not be a clone for xen.git. Indeed, it is a set of >>>>> drivers that, as you said, do not have a home in xen.git or kernel.git >>>>> >>>> Indeed. What I've got in mind is something like the following: >>>> >>>> xenbits.org/[artem?]/xen-automotive.git integration tree >> I am assuming xen-automotive.git = xen.git with hacks (as a staging tree) >> So wouldn't it be better the to have >> xenbits/people/automotive/artem?/xen.git instead of a renamed tree? > Please can we keep subproject names out of the people namespace, it's > just confusing things (i.e. is that an official repo of some sort or > not?). /people/artem/xen.git is perfectly fine as a name for Artem's > repo. /people/artem/xen.git is fine with me. Lars