From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:18619 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750717AbaFJPEM (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 11:04:12 -0400 Message-ID: <53971E68.3060200@RedHat.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 11:04:08 -0400 From: Steve Dickson MIME-Version: 1.0 To: andros@netapp.com, trond.myklebust@primarydata.com CC: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] NFS: Fix SECINFO processing regression References: <1402342401-5640-1-git-send-email-andros@netapp.com> In-Reply-To: <1402342401-5640-1-git-send-email-andros@netapp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/09/2014 03:33 PM, andros@netapp.com wrote: > From: Andy Adamson > > Iterate over multiple flavors returned by SECINFO. If RPC_AUTH_GSS is in the > secinfo list, fully test (get and auth, credential, and gss_context) > > Fix some error paths. > > Testing: Minimal testing of the nfs_test_gss_flavor. Will run more tests after > the June 2014 bakeathon > > Note: Can supply a patch for SECINFO_NO_name to use nfs4_negotiate_security. > > Andy Adamson (3): > NFS check the return of nfs4_negotiate_security in nfs4_submount > NFS Return -EPERM if no supported or matching SECINFO flavor > NFS test SECINFO RPC_AUTH_GSS pseudoflavors for support > > fs/nfs/nfs4namespace.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > Tested-By: Steve Dickson