From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <5397280D.5050608@web-yard.de> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:45:17 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIEdhdWw=?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <53957653.5000406@meshcoding.com> <1402334059-28681-1-git-send-email-gaul@web-yard.de> <53962199.4060202@meshcoding.com> <539628F6.9070706@web-yard.de> <53969F3D.5040306@meshcoding.com> <5397267F.4040107@web-yard.de> <539726E7.9070500@meshcoding.com> In-Reply-To: <539726E7.9070500@meshcoding.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] remove unnecessary logspam Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Antonio Quartulli , The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Am 10.06.2014 17:40, schrieb Antonio Quartulli: > Oh you are right. I should have continued using mutt... hehe, I'm glad it works now! :) I'll resubmit in a minute as a new thread. btw: do you have any pointers to documentation that can help me understand why the kernel developers still use email as the primary channel for submitting patches? Given the fact that git gracefully handles the transmission of code, the handling of all code via email appears archaic and too complicated to me. (no flame war intended, I just want to learn about the reasons!) ;) Cheers, André -- Homepage http://page.math.tu-berlin.de/~gaul github https://github.com/andrenarchy Twitter https://twitter.com/#!/andrenarchy Diaspora https://diasp.org/u/andrenarchy (you won't find me on facebook!) Jabber gaul@web-yard.de PGP Key 0x0FA9170E