From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/21] xen/arm: segregate and split GIC low level functionality Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 23:46:23 +0100 Message-ID: <539A2DBF.7060601@linaro.org> References: <1402580192-13937-1-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> <1402580192-13937-7-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Stefano Stabellini , vijay.kilari@gmail.com Cc: Ian.Campbell@citrix.com, Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com, Vijaya Kumar K , tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 12/06/14 17:26, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > That's better: same locking as before. > At this point you should keep the: > > ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&desc->lock)); +1 this assert is very handy in debug mode to know if the caller correctly take the desc lock. Regards, -- Julien Grall