From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chanwoo Choi Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: Use cpufreq-cpu0 driver for Exynos3250 Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:06:30 +0900 Message-ID: <539AA2F6.6050600@samsung.com> References: <1402639693-31108-1-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout2.samsung.com ([203.254.224.25]:51265 "EHLO mailout2.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750817AbaFMHGj (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2014 03:06:39 -0400 In-reply-to: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Abraham Cc: Viresh Kumar , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , linux-samsung-soc , Mike Turquette , Shawn Guo , Kukjin Kim , Tomasz Figa , =?UTF-8?B?SGVpa28gU3TDvGJuZXI=?= , Kyungmin Park , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Hi Thomas, On 06/13/2014 04:00 PM, Thomas Abraham wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> cpufreq@vger.kernel.org is dead now. Anyway you should be using linux-pm >> instead. >> >> On 13 June 2014 11:38, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >>> This patchset use cpufreq-cpu0 driver to support Exynos3250 cpufreq. So, this >>> patchset is based on following patchset[1] by Thomas Abraham. >>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg31593.html >>> >>> Chanwoo Choi (4): >>> clk: samsung: exynos3250: Use cpu-clock provider type to support cpufreq >>> clk: samsung: Add support for cpu clocks of Exynos3250 >>> Documentation: devicetree: Add cpu clock configuration data binding for Exynos3250 >>> ARM: dts: Exynos: Add cpu clock table and armclk divider table for Exynos3250 >>> >>> .../devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos3250-clock.txt | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++---- >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos3250.c | 14 +++++++--- >>> 4 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> >> Nothing really cpufreq specific. Would *eagerly* wait for the patch that >> removes existing driver files :) > > The next version of the exynos cpufreq cleanup patches are being > prepared. But exynos4x12 cpufreq driver will not be included for > cleanup since the boost frequency bindings need more work. After you send next patchset, I'll rebase it and resend patchset to support exynos3250 cpufreq. Thanks, Chanwoo Choi From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: cw00.choi@samsung.com (Chanwoo Choi) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:06:30 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: Use cpufreq-cpu0 driver for Exynos3250 In-Reply-To: References: <1402639693-31108-1-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com> Message-ID: <539AA2F6.6050600@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Thomas, On 06/13/2014 04:00 PM, Thomas Abraham wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> cpufreq at vger.kernel.org is dead now. Anyway you should be using linux-pm >> instead. >> >> On 13 June 2014 11:38, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >>> This patchset use cpufreq-cpu0 driver to support Exynos3250 cpufreq. So, this >>> patchset is based on following patchset[1] by Thomas Abraham. >>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg31593.html >>> >>> Chanwoo Choi (4): >>> clk: samsung: exynos3250: Use cpu-clock provider type to support cpufreq >>> clk: samsung: Add support for cpu clocks of Exynos3250 >>> Documentation: devicetree: Add cpu clock configuration data binding for Exynos3250 >>> ARM: dts: Exynos: Add cpu clock table and armclk divider table for Exynos3250 >>> >>> .../devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos3250-clock.txt | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++---- >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos3250.c | 14 +++++++--- >>> 4 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> >> Nothing really cpufreq specific. Would *eagerly* wait for the patch that >> removes existing driver files :) > > The next version of the exynos cpufreq cleanup patches are being > prepared. But exynos4x12 cpufreq driver will not be included for > cleanup since the boost frequency bindings need more work. After you send next patchset, I'll rebase it and resend patchset to support exynos3250 cpufreq. Thanks, Chanwoo Choi