From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFEB97F3F for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 09:29:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 850DAAC00F for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 07:29:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id a6qw6gHpFtBtXTSZ for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 07:29:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <539EFF41.2070302@sandeen.net> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 09:29:21 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: indicate default mount options in xfs.5 manpage References: <5398B5ED.6030703@redhat.com> <5398B649.6020600@sandeen.net> <20140616094020.GC26172@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20140616094020.GC26172@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Eric Sandeen , Karel Zak , xfs-oss On 6/16/14, 4:40 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 03:04:25PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Not every pair of mount options indicated which was the >> default, so add those. > > Looks good, but why have this separate from the previous patch? > just to keep the move separate from any "functional" changes. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs