From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: Please revert / review 077fc1c04d70ef1748ac2daa6622b3320a1a004c Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 15:52:59 +0100 Message-ID: <539F20EB020000780001AB5A@mail.emea.novell.com> References: <5399828D02000078000B63B7@mail.emea.novell.com> <539EC228020000780001A7FC@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Matthias Cc: Yang Z Zhang , "tim@xen.org" , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 16.06.14 at 15:42, wrote: > According to Jans suggestion, I did a second build with xen up to the > changeset he suggested and attached another round of logs. Interesting - at least the addresses aren't as bogus anymore: (XEN) AMD-Vi: IO_PAGE_FAULT: domain = 1, device id = 0x500, fault address = 0x1d27d0000, flags = 0 Are you indeed assigning around 8Gb (or more) to this guest? Jan