From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966271AbaFRLb7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2014 07:31:59 -0400 Received: from mail.dev.rtsoft.ru ([213.79.90.226]:48998 "EHLO dev.rtsoft.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933954AbaFRLb6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2014 07:31:58 -0400 Message-ID: <53A178AD.3060003@dev.rtsoft.ru> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:31:57 +0400 From: Nikita Yushchenko Organization: RTSoft Software Development Center User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lee Jones CC: Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Thomas Gleixner , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lugovskoy@dev.rtsoft.ru Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/21] mfd: use devm_irq_of_parse_and_map() where appropriate References: <1401880402-30091-1-git-send-email-nyushchenko@dev.rtsoft.ru> <1401880402-30091-12-git-send-email-nyushchenko@dev.rtsoft.ru> <20140617151226.GM29841@lee--X1> <53A0606C.6030400@dev.rtsoft.ru> <20140618084838.GR21030@lee--X1> In-Reply-To: <20140618084838.GR21030@lee--X1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Hmm... probably it was too early to apply this? I was just going >> to prepare v2, based on discussion... > > Which discussion? One you are replying in? https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/4/136 >> Also, applying only 11/21, without 01/21, will just cause build errors ... > > CC'ing me on this patch alone when you know you have build > dependencies on other patches in the set is a bad idea. Failing to > mention that you wanted the patch to be handled in a special and/or > unconventional way is an even worse idea. > > How are you expecting this patch(-set) to be handled? Sorry but I did not CC you this patch. I sent entire patchset to mailing lists and to maintainers of IRQ and device tree subsystems. I used git send-email, and all mails went out to the same recipients. Recipient addresses extracted using scripts/get_maintainer.pl applied to the "main" patch of the patchset. I did not sent entire patchset to maintainers of individual changed drivers because this makes recipient address too big and too much looks like spamming. I did not send individual patches to individual addresses to avoid cases of partially-applied patchset that will just break things (actually this is what happened with 11/21) I'm quite sorry if I did things wrong, it was my first attempt to sent patchset with tree-wide fixes. However, I don't see what I've done wrong... any hints on that will be appreciated. Nikita From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nikita Yushchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/21] mfd: use devm_irq_of_parse_and_map() where appropriate Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:31:57 +0400 Message-ID: <53A178AD.3060003@dev.rtsoft.ru> References: <1401880402-30091-1-git-send-email-nyushchenko@dev.rtsoft.ru> <1401880402-30091-12-git-send-email-nyushchenko@dev.rtsoft.ru> <20140617151226.GM29841@lee--X1> <53A0606C.6030400@dev.rtsoft.ru> <20140618084838.GR21030@lee--X1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140618084838.GR21030@lee--X1> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Lee Jones Cc: Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Thomas Gleixner , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, lugovskoy-jFhMxQ4mL6a2X5qOxWx28w@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org >> Hmm... probably it was too early to apply this? I was just going >> to prepare v2, based on discussion... > > Which discussion? One you are replying in? https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/4/136 >> Also, applying only 11/21, without 01/21, will just cause build errors ... > > CC'ing me on this patch alone when you know you have build > dependencies on other patches in the set is a bad idea. Failing to > mention that you wanted the patch to be handled in a special and/or > unconventional way is an even worse idea. > > How are you expecting this patch(-set) to be handled? Sorry but I did not CC you this patch. I sent entire patchset to mailing lists and to maintainers of IRQ and device tree subsystems. I used git send-email, and all mails went out to the same recipients. Recipient addresses extracted using scripts/get_maintainer.pl applied to the "main" patch of the patchset. I did not sent entire patchset to maintainers of individual changed drivers because this makes recipient address too big and too much looks like spamming. I did not send individual patches to individual addresses to avoid cases of partially-applied patchset that will just break things (actually this is what happened with 11/21) I'm quite sorry if I did things wrong, it was my first attempt to sent patchset with tree-wide fixes. However, I don't see what I've done wrong... any hints on that will be appreciated. Nikita -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html