From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: Xen 4.5 development update Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 21:47:41 +0100 Message-ID: <53A1FAED.70506@citrix.com> References: <20140618202255.7B1C6A322F@laptop.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WxMnI-0000dP-Mb for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 20:49:20 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20140618202255.7B1C6A322F@laptop.dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: konrad.wilk@oracle.com, julien.grall@linaro.org, avanzini.arianna@gmail.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, roy.franz@linaro.org, vijay.kilari@gmail.com, Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com, serge.broslavsky@linaro.org, christoffer.dall@linaro.org, w1.huang@samsung.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com, mukesh.rathor@oracle.com, daniel.kiper@oracle.com, dslutz@verizon.com, dario.faggioli@citrix.com, malcolm.crossley@citrix.com, yang.z.zhang@intel.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, Paul.Durrant@citrix.com, dongxiao.xu@intel.com, shantong.kang@intel.com, msw@amazon.com, bob.liu@oracle.com, aravindp@cisco.com, JBeulich@suse.com, Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com, tiejun.chen@intel.com, Kelly.Zytaruk@amd.com, Wei.Liu2@citrix.com, olaf@aepfle.de, zhigang.x.wang@oracle.com, roger.pau@citrix.com, guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com, eddie.dong@intel.com, zoltan.kiss@citrix.com, ufimtseva@gmai List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 18/06/2014 21:22, konrad.wilk@oracle.com wrote: > > The states are: none -> fair -> ok -> good -> done > > none - nothing yet > fair - still working on it, patches are prototypes or RFC > ok - patches posted, acting on review > good - some last minute pieces > done - all done, might have bugs > > > = Open = > > == x86 == > > * New migration. (good) > - Andrew Cooper & David Vrabel This is still very much "fair" given your definition above. The libxl work is still at the very start of planning without any real code yet, and there are other areas still not started such as remus and tmem. The libxc stuff is still RFC with TODOs remaining. > > > * ioreq-server, aka secondary emulators (good) > Chase down XSM maintainer > - Paul Durrant This is fully committed as far as I am aware, so is done. ~Andrew