From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Courbot Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: TN7: relax some regulators Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 18:49:15 +0900 Message-ID: <53A4039B.7000504@nvidia.com> References: <1403164154-1362-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <53A308C8.2070004@wwwdotorg.org> <20140619175643.GR5099@sirena.org.uk> <53A3C613.8030207@nvidia.com> <53A3D85E.7030704@nvidia.com> <20140620094119.GT5099@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140620094119.GT5099-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Stephen Warren , Keerthy , Nishanth Menon , Thierry Reding , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 06/20/2014 06:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 03:44:46PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > >> dbabd624d >> regulator: palmas: Reemove open coded functions with helper functions > >> Keerthy, Nishanth, could it be that there is still something wrong with the >> REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE() definitions? > >> This seems to be the cause for our trouble, but the other questions might >> still stand, in case there is interest in discussing them. > > There was a bug fix to the Palmas driver which just went to Linus the > other day, are you sure this isn't fixed in mainline (or -next, it's > been in -next for a week or something)? If you are talking about 6b7f2d82d5 regulator: palmas: Fix SMPS list for 0V then it is in my tree. There is actually no difference on palmas-regulator.c between my tree and the current -next (or Linus' tree for that instance). So it seems to be something else we are dealing with here. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966126AbaFTJtV (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jun 2014 05:49:21 -0400 Received: from hqemgate15.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.64]:7724 "EHLO hqemgate15.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964815AbaFTJtT (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jun 2014 05:49:19 -0400 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqnvupgp08.nvidia.com on Fri, 20 Jun 2014 02:43:31 -0700 Message-ID: <53A4039B.7000504@nvidia.com> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 18:49:15 +0900 From: Alexandre Courbot Organization: NVIDIA User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Brown CC: Stephen Warren , Keerthy , Nishanth Menon , Thierry Reding , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: TN7: relax some regulators References: <1403164154-1362-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <53A308C8.2070004@wwwdotorg.org> <20140619175643.GR5099@sirena.org.uk> <53A3C613.8030207@nvidia.com> <53A3D85E.7030704@nvidia.com> <20140620094119.GT5099@sirena.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20140620094119.GT5099@sirena.org.uk> X-NVConfidentiality: public Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/20/2014 06:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 03:44:46PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > >> dbabd624d >> regulator: palmas: Reemove open coded functions with helper functions > >> Keerthy, Nishanth, could it be that there is still something wrong with the >> REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE() definitions? > >> This seems to be the cause for our trouble, but the other questions might >> still stand, in case there is interest in discussing them. > > There was a bug fix to the Palmas driver which just went to Linus the > other day, are you sure this isn't fixed in mainline (or -next, it's > been in -next for a week or something)? If you are talking about 6b7f2d82d5 regulator: palmas: Fix SMPS list for 0V then it is in my tree. There is actually no difference on palmas-regulator.c between my tree and the current -next (or Linus' tree for that instance). So it seems to be something else we are dealing with here.