From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/21] arm64: GICv3 support Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 18:45:45 +0100 Message-ID: <53B596C9.2060701@arm.com> References: <1404140510-5382-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <20140630154337.GR23978@titan.lakedaemon.net> <53B18732.4070509@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , Mark Rutland , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , Christoffer Dall , Thomas Gleixner To: Jason Cooper Return-path: Received: from fw-tnat.austin.arm.com ([217.140.110.23]:59949 "EHLO collaborate-mta1.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759210AbaGCRpv (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2014 13:45:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <53B18732.4070509@arm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Jason, On 30/06/14 16:50, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Hi Jason, > > On 30/06/14 16:43, Jason Cooper wrote: >> Marc, >> >> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 04:01:29PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> I now have received enough Reviewed-by from people familiar with the >>> architecture, and a number of Tested-by from actual implementors, >>> which (IMHO) makes ready for merging into 3.17 (Thomas, Jason: How do >>> you want to play it? We have a rather big dependency between the first >>> few patches and the rest of the stuff, which is KVM only). >> >> On a quick glance, it looks like patch #1 is conflict-prone and #2 crosses >> outside of irqchip/. So, I could setup a topic branch for #1 that >> we'll both use. Then I'll Ack #2 for you to take. Would that work for >> you? > > That'd be absolutely great. Just point me to the topic branch you'd like > to use, and I'll get it into the KVM/ARM tree. Sorry to pester you... Do you have any update on this? Christoffer and I are putting our queue together for the next merge window, and I'd really like to get this going before disappearing on holiday... Thanks a lot, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier) Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 18:45:45 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v6 00/21] arm64: GICv3 support In-Reply-To: <53B18732.4070509@arm.com> References: <1404140510-5382-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <20140630154337.GR23978@titan.lakedaemon.net> <53B18732.4070509@arm.com> Message-ID: <53B596C9.2060701@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Jason, On 30/06/14 16:50, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Hi Jason, > > On 30/06/14 16:43, Jason Cooper wrote: >> Marc, >> >> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 04:01:29PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> I now have received enough Reviewed-by from people familiar with the >>> architecture, and a number of Tested-by from actual implementors, >>> which (IMHO) makes ready for merging into 3.17 (Thomas, Jason: How do >>> you want to play it? We have a rather big dependency between the first >>> few patches and the rest of the stuff, which is KVM only). >> >> On a quick glance, it looks like patch #1 is conflict-prone and #2 crosses >> outside of irqchip/. So, I could setup a topic branch for #1 that >> we'll both use. Then I'll Ack #2 for you to take. Would that work for >> you? > > That'd be absolutely great. Just point me to the topic branch you'd like > to use, and I'll get it into the KVM/ARM tree. Sorry to pester you... Do you have any update on this? Christoffer and I are putting our queue together for the next merge window, and I'd really like to get this going before disappearing on holiday... Thanks a lot, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...