From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38813) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X35k5-0007iS-RD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Jul 2014 11:49:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X35jz-0003or-Nx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Jul 2014 11:49:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13354) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X35jz-0003oh-G4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Jul 2014 11:49:35 -0400 Message-ID: <53B6CCF9.7030802@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 17:49:13 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2082461657.19366315.1404488165989.JavaMail.root@openwide.fr> In-Reply-To: <2082461657.19366315.1404488165989.JavaMail.root@openwide.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V3 0/6] icount: Implement delay algorithm between guest and host clocks List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Sebastian Tanase Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, peter maydell , aliguori@amazon.com, wenchaoqemu@gmail.com, quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mjt@tls.msk.ru, mst@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, michael@walle.cc, alex@alex.org.uk, crobinso@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de, rth@twiddle.net Il 04/07/2014 17:36, Sebastian Tanase ha scritto: > I've also made some changes to patch 4 (added Sleep() function call when compiling > for Windows and other small modifications); is it ok if I merge them with the existing > patch 4 on your "icount" branch and then rebase the other patches? Sure. Paolo