All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "Srivatsa S . Bhat" <srivatsa@mit.edu>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] cpufreq: Don't destroy/realloc policy/sysfs on hotplug/suspend
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:19:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C6D049.7000705@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpomt34NcMH=H5L_fhf-6R6p27_h=aCNcpT6T12u35d=Z+w@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/16/2014 01:30 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 16 July 2014 05:58, Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>> +       if (!cpus && cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu &&
>>> cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
>>> +               cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
>>> +       }
>>>
>>
>> Viresh, I tried your suggestion (and my initial thought too) to combine this
>> as an if/else with the previous if. But the indentation got nasty and made
>> it hard to read. I'm sure the compiler will optimize it. So, I would prefer
>> to leave it this way.
>
> Okay, I gave that comment again :)
>
> Try this:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index f72b2b7..092a0ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -991,8 +991,10 @@ static int cpufreq_change_policy_cpus(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy,
>                                          CPUFREQ_UPDATE_POLICY_CPU, policy);
>          }
>
> -       cpus = !cpumask_empty(policy->cpus);
> -       if (has_target() && cpus) {
> +       if (!cpumask_empty(policy->cpus)) {
> +               if (!has_target())
> +                       goto unlock;
> +
>                  ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
>                  if (!ret)
>                          ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
> @@ -1001,9 +1003,7 @@ static int cpufreq_change_policy_cpus(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy,
>                          pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n", __func__);
>                          goto unlock;
>                  }
> -       }
> -
> -       if (!cpus && cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu && cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
> +       } else if (cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu && cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
>                  cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
>          }
>

Not bad :) I'll take it.

-Saravana

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com>,
	"Srivatsa S . Bhat" <srivatsa@mit.edu>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] cpufreq: Don't destroy/realloc policy/sysfs on hotplug/suspend
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:19:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C6D049.7000705@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpomt34NcMH=H5L_fhf-6R6p27_h=aCNcpT6T12u35d=Z+w@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/16/2014 01:30 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 16 July 2014 05:58, Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>> +       if (!cpus && cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu &&
>>> cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
>>> +               cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
>>> +       }
>>>
>>
>> Viresh, I tried your suggestion (and my initial thought too) to combine this
>> as an if/else with the previous if. But the indentation got nasty and made
>> it hard to read. I'm sure the compiler will optimize it. So, I would prefer
>> to leave it this way.
>
> Okay, I gave that comment again :)
>
> Try this:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index f72b2b7..092a0ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -991,8 +991,10 @@ static int cpufreq_change_policy_cpus(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy,
>                                          CPUFREQ_UPDATE_POLICY_CPU, policy);
>          }
>
> -       cpus = !cpumask_empty(policy->cpus);
> -       if (has_target() && cpus) {
> +       if (!cpumask_empty(policy->cpus)) {
> +               if (!has_target())
> +                       goto unlock;
> +
>                  ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
>                  if (!ret)
>                          ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
> @@ -1001,9 +1003,7 @@ static int cpufreq_change_policy_cpus(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy,
>                          pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n", __func__);
>                          goto unlock;
>                  }
> -       }
> -
> -       if (!cpus && cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu && cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
> +       } else if (cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu && cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
>                  cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
>          }
>

Not bad :) I'll take it.

-Saravana

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: skannan@codeaurora.org (Saravana Kannan)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] cpufreq: Don't destroy/realloc policy/sysfs on hotplug/suspend
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:19:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C6D049.7000705@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpomt34NcMH=H5L_fhf-6R6p27_h=aCNcpT6T12u35d=Z+w@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/16/2014 01:30 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 16 July 2014 05:58, Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>> +       if (!cpus && cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu &&
>>> cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
>>> +               cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
>>> +       }
>>>
>>
>> Viresh, I tried your suggestion (and my initial thought too) to combine this
>> as an if/else with the previous if. But the indentation got nasty and made
>> it hard to read. I'm sure the compiler will optimize it. So, I would prefer
>> to leave it this way.
>
> Okay, I gave that comment again :)
>
> Try this:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index f72b2b7..092a0ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -991,8 +991,10 @@ static int cpufreq_change_policy_cpus(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy,
>                                          CPUFREQ_UPDATE_POLICY_CPU, policy);
>          }
>
> -       cpus = !cpumask_empty(policy->cpus);
> -       if (has_target() && cpus) {
> +       if (!cpumask_empty(policy->cpus)) {
> +               if (!has_target())
> +                       goto unlock;
> +
>                  ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
>                  if (!ret)
>                          ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
> @@ -1001,9 +1003,7 @@ static int cpufreq_change_policy_cpus(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy,
>                          pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n", __func__);
>                          goto unlock;
>                  }
> -       }
> -
> -       if (!cpus && cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu && cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
> +       } else if (cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu && cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
>                  cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
>          }
>

Not bad :) I'll take it.

-Saravana

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-16 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 205+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-10  2:37 [PATCH] cpufreq: Don't destroy/realloc policy/sysfs on hotplug/suspend Saravana Kannan
2014-07-10  2:37 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-11  4:18 ` [PATCH v2] " Saravana Kannan
2014-07-11  4:18   ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-11  6:19   ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-11  6:19     ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-11  6:19     ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-11  9:59     ` skannan
2014-07-11  9:59       ` skannan at codeaurora.org
2014-07-11  9:59       ` skannan
2014-07-11 10:07       ` skannan
2014-07-11 10:07         ` skannan at codeaurora.org
2014-07-11 10:07         ` skannan
2014-07-11 10:52       ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-11 10:52         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-11 10:52         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-12  2:44         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-12  2:44           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-12  2:44           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-14  6:09           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-14  6:09             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-14  6:09             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-14 19:08             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-14 19:08               ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-14 19:08               ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-15  4:35               ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-15  4:35                 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-15  4:35                 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-15  5:36                 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-15  5:36                   ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-15  5:36                   ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-15  5:52                   ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-15  5:52                     ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-15  5:52                     ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-15  6:58                   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-15  6:58                     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-15  6:58                     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-15 17:35                     ` skannan
2014-07-15 17:35                       ` skannan at codeaurora.org
2014-07-15 17:35                       ` skannan
2014-07-16  7:44                       ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16  7:44                         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16  7:44                         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16  5:44                     ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16  5:44                       ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16  5:44                       ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16  7:49                       ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16  7:49                         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16  7:49                         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-12  3:06     ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-12  3:06       ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-12  3:06       ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-14  6:13       ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-14  6:13         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-14  6:13         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-14 19:10         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-14 19:10           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-14 19:10           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-11  7:43   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-11  7:43     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-11 10:02     ` skannan
2014-07-11 10:02       ` skannan at codeaurora.org
2014-07-15 22:47   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Simplify hotplug/suspend handling Saravana Kannan
2014-07-15 22:47     ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-15 22:47     ` [PATCH v3 1/2] cpufreq: Don't destroy/realloc policy/sysfs on hotplug/suspend Saravana Kannan
2014-07-15 22:47       ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16  0:28       ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16  0:28         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16  8:30         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16  8:30           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16  8:30           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 19:19           ` Saravana Kannan [this message]
2014-07-16 19:19             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 19:19             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16  8:24       ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16  8:24         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16  8:24         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 11:16         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16 11:16           ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16 11:16           ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16 13:13           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 13:13             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 13:13             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 18:04             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16 18:04               ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16 18:04               ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-07-16 19:56             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 19:56               ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 19:56               ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-17  5:51               ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-17  5:51                 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-17  5:51                 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 19:56           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 19:56             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 19:56             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-17  5:35             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-17  5:35               ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-17  5:35               ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-18  3:25               ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-18  3:25                 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-18  3:25                 ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-18  4:19                 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-18  4:19                   ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-18  4:19                   ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 20:25         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 20:25           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 20:25           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 21:45           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 21:45             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 21:45             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-17  6:24           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-17  6:24             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-17  6:24             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 14:29       ` Dirk Brandewie
2014-07-16 14:29         ` Dirk Brandewie
2014-07-16 15:28         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 15:28           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 15:28           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 19:42           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 19:42             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 19:42             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-15 22:47     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: Simplify and fix mutual exclusion with hotplug Saravana Kannan
2014-07-15 22:47       ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16  8:48       ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16  8:48         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16  8:48         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-16 19:34         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 19:34           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 19:34           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25  1:07     ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Simplify hotplug/suspend handling Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25  1:07       ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25  1:07       ` [PATCH v4 1/5] cpufreq: Don't wait for CPU to going offline to restart governor Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25  1:07         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-31 20:47         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-31 20:47           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25  1:07       ` [PATCH v4 2/5] cpufreq: Keep track of which CPU owns the kobj/sysfs nodes separately Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25  1:07         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-08-07  9:02         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07  9:02           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07  9:02           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-25  1:07       ` [PATCH v4 3/5] cpufreq: Don't destroy/realloc policy/sysfs on hotplug/suspend Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25  1:07         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-31 21:56         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-31 21:56           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-31 22:15           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-31 22:15             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-31 23:48           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-31 23:48             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-31 23:48             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-08-07 10:51           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07 10:51             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07 10:51             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-12  9:17             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-12  9:17               ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-12  9:17               ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07 10:48         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07 10:48           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07 10:48           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-11 22:13           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-08-11 22:13             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-08-11 22:13             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-08-12  8:51             ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-12  8:51               ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-12  8:51               ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-25  1:07       ` [PATCH v4 4/5] cpufreq: Properly handle physical CPU hot-add/hot-remove Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25  1:07         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25  1:07         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-08-07 11:02         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07 11:02           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07 11:02           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-11 22:15           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-08-11 22:15             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-08-11 22:15             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25  1:07       ` [PATCH v4 5/5] cpufreq: Delete dead code related to policy save/restore Saravana Kannan
2014-07-25  1:07         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-08-07 11:06         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07 11:06           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-08-07 11:06           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-29  5:52       ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Simplify hotplug/suspend handling skannan
2014-07-29  5:52         ` skannan at codeaurora.org
2014-07-29  5:52         ` skannan
2014-07-30  0:29       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-30  0:29         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-31 20:25         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-31 20:25           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-08-07  6:04         ` skannan
2014-08-07  6:04           ` skannan at codeaurora.org
2014-10-16  8:53       ` Viresh Kumar
2014-10-16  8:53         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-10-16  8:53         ` Viresh Kumar
2014-10-23 21:41         ` Saravana Kannan
2014-10-23 21:41           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-10-23 21:41           ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 22:02 ` [PATCH] cpufreq: Don't destroy/realloc policy/sysfs on hotplug/suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-16 22:02   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-16 22:35   ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-16 22:35     ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-24  3:02   ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-24  3:02     ` Saravana Kannan
2014-07-24  5:04     ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-24  5:04       ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-24  5:04       ` Viresh Kumar
2014-07-24  9:12       ` skannan
2014-07-24  9:12         ` skannan at codeaurora.org
2014-07-24  9:12         ` skannan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53C6D049.7000705@codeaurora.org \
    --to=skannan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=srivatsa@mit.edu \
    --cc=toddpoynor@google.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.