From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52274) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X7fDW-0007jC-J5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 02:31:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X7fDL-0003Hd-1Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 02:30:58 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]:63115) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X7fDK-0003HU-Rm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 02:30:46 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f175.google.com with SMTP id r10so1089471pdi.20 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 23:30:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53C76D8F.4070705@ozlabs.ru> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 16:30:39 +1000 From: Alexey Kardashevskiy MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1402630619-4408-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <1402630619-4408-4-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <20140613080011.7048ce6c.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> <539BB66E.10408@ozlabs.ru> <20140616091606.2343cc08.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> <539EABC2.2010307@ozlabs.ru> <539EACBC.6060705@suse.de> <53A82C8A.4020908@ozlabs.ru> <53B4E31F.1040801@ozlabs.ru> <87ha2yudb1.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <53C34BD9.1040001@ozlabs.ru> <53C43DBE.1080706@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <53C43DBE.1080706@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 3/4] s390x: Migrate to new NMI interface List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , Markus Armbruster Cc: Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Luiz Capitulino , Christian Borntraeger , Alexander Graf , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Cornelia Huck , Richard Henderson On 07/15/2014 06:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 14/07/2014 05:17, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >>> > No, you should politely bother them again. >> >> That does not seem helping though :-/ > > Sorry. :) > > Well, patch 1 is the same as v6 and for the others Cornelia and Alex can > ack it. It looks good to me though. Let me clarify things here. Alex rb'ed to 0/4, Cornelia rb'ed 2/4 and 3/4, so I put Alex's rb to 1&2&3&4&5, Cornelia's rb to 2&3, rebase it on top of the current upstream, repost after 2.1 is released and resume annoying people again. Is that correct? This is my current set: 5/5 pc_piix: Migrate to new NMI interface 4/5 spapr: Add support for new NMI interface 3/5 s390x: Migrate to new NMI interface 2/5 s390x: Convert QEMUMachine to MachineClass 1/5 cpus: Define callback for QEMU "nmi" command -- Alexey