From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754661AbaGWG0G (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2014 02:26:06 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:20398 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751722AbaGWG0F (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2014 02:26:05 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,715,1400050800"; d="scan'208";a="565880828" Message-ID: <53CF5531.90709@intel.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 09:24:49 +0300 From: Adrian Hunter Organization: Intel Finland Oy, Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki, Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4, Domiciled in Helsinki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jiri Olsa CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Ahern , Frederic Weisbecker , Namhyung Kim , Paul Mackerras , Stephane Eranian Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/52] perf tools: Add perf_pmu__scan_file() References: <1406035081-14301-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> <1406035081-14301-14-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> <20140722190901.GC29750@krava.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20140722190901.GC29750@krava.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/22/2014 10:09 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 04:17:22PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: > > SNIP > >> + >> +static FILE *perf_pmu__open_file(struct perf_pmu *pmu, const char *name) >> +{ >> + struct stat st; >> + char path[PATH_MAX]; >> + const char *sysfs; >> + >> + sysfs = sysfs__mountpoint(); >> + if (!sysfs) >> + return NULL; >> + >> + snprintf(path, PATH_MAX, >> + "%s" EVENT_SOURCE_DEVICE_PATH "%s/%s", sysfs, pmu->name, name); >> + >> + if (stat(path, &st) < 0) >> + return NULL; >> + >> + return fopen(path, "r"); >> +} > > looks like this function could be used in pmu_cpumask and pmu_type > and maybe others There is existing code duplication between them. Given the large number of patches I would say it is easier to deal with that separately.