From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44374) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X9ydy-0007FT-Fp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:39:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X9ydq-0001Ie-TS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:39:50 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f171.google.com ([74.125.82.171]:63616) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X9ydq-0001IT-NV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:39:42 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id p10so1372979wes.16 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 08:39:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53CFD71F.9050206@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:39:11 +0200 From: Eric Auger MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1404716892-15600-1-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org> <1404716892-15600-8-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org> <53BBF7E2.1090507@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <53BBF7E2.1090507@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/7] hw/misc/platform_devices: Add platform_bus_base to PlatformDevtreeData List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf , eric.auger@st.com, christoffer.dall@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kim.phillips@freescale.com, a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, stuart.yoder@freescale.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu On 07/08/2014 03:53 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 07.07.14 09:08, Eric Auger wrote: >> The base address of the platform bus sometimes is used to build the >> property. >> >> --- >> >> Actually I did not succeed in doing it another way with Calxeda xgmac. >> If someone knows how to do without, please advise. > > Not sure I understand. The "regs" properties live inside the parent's > "ranges". So in device tree the only thing that should be aware of the > bus offset is the platform bus node, no? yes I full agree with you as I mentioned in a previous email. I tried to use instead of but I never succeeded in making it work. Maybe a syntax issue, ... I need to spend some more time on it/ get some help and fix that ... BR Eric > > > Alex >