From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 07/12] create handle_cmdline() function Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 08:36:14 +0100 Message-ID: <53D0D38E020000780002560E@mail.emea.novell.com> References: <1405989815-25236-1-git-send-email-roy.franz@linaro.org> <1405989815-25236-8-git-send-email-roy.franz@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1405989815-25236-8-git-send-email-roy.franz@linaro.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Roy Franz Cc: keir@xen.org, ian.campbell@citrix.com, tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com, linaro-uefi@lists.linaro.org, fu.wei@linaro.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 22.07.14 at 02:43, wrote: > Create handle_cmdline() function in preparation for sharing to allow x86 and > ARM architectures to share the command line processing. I again can't see why the function doesn't get moved to the shared file right away. And of course the splitting out again is questionable considering that efi_start() itself ought to ultimately become a shared function. By now I think you should have taken this the other way round: Move the whole xen/arch/x86/efi/ subtree to xen/common/efi/ and _then_ split out x86 specific code (possibly into inline functions or #define-s rather than out of line code). Jan