From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37844) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XAH9Q-0003j7-N1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 07:25:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XAH9K-000087-2H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 07:25:32 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:55737 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XAH9J-00007q-LH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 07:25:25 -0400 Message-ID: <53D0ED22.2000703@suse.de> Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 13:25:22 +0200 From: Alexander Graf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1404716892-15600-1-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org> <1404716892-15600-6-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org> <53BBF781.9070102@suse.de> <53CFD5D2.4090602@linaro.org> <53D03F05.7000603@suse.de> <53D0B779.7090503@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <53D0B779.7090503@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/7] hw/core/sysbus: add fdt_add_node method List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Auger , eric.auger@st.com, christoffer.dall@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kim.phillips@freescale.com, a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, stuart.yoder@freescale.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, Scott Wood , a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com, Rob Herring , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu On 24.07.14 09:36, Eric Auger wrote: > On 07/24/2014 01:02 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> On 23.07.14 17:33, Eric Auger wrote: >>> On 07/08/2014 03:52 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >>>> On 07.07.14 09:08, Eric Auger wrote: >>>>> This method is meant to be called on sysbus device dynamic >>>>> instantiation (-device option). Devices that support this >>>>> kind of instantiation must implement this method. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger >>>> For the reason I stated earlier, I don't think it's a good idea to put >>>> device tree code into our device models. >>> Hi Alex, >>> >>> I would propose we discuss that topic during next KVM call if you are >>> available. >> I lost track when that would be. Next week would work fine, the week >> after not :). > Hi Alex, > > Unfortunately I think the last one was this week. If you are available > next week I would propose to setup a short call next week. Sure! > Who are the > required people in the call aside us and Peter? It would be good if we could have one person on the call who has a very good understanding of cross-platform device trees. Scott Wood or Rob Herring come to my mind here. Scott, Rob, would either of you be available for a quick call on device tree abstraction levels in QEMU Tuesday next week? Alex