From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752137AbaG2TGX (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:06:23 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:50463 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751165AbaG2TGV (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:06:21 -0400 Message-ID: <53D7F0A4.2050301@linutronix.de> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 21:06:12 +0200 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, tony@atomide.com, balbi@ti.com, Russell King , Vinod Koul , Dan Williams , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] dmaengine: omap-dma: complete the transfer on terminate_all References: <1406660344-25307-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <1406660344-25307-3-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <1406660344-25307-3-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/29/2014 08:58 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/dma/omap-dma.c b/drivers/dma/omap-dma.c > index b19f04f..81ede01 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/omap-dma.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/omap-dma.c > @@ -970,6 +970,12 @@ static int omap_dma_terminate_all(struct omap_chan *c) > > /* Prevent this channel being scheduled */ > spin_lock(&d->lock); > + if (!c->desc && !list_empty(&c->node)) { > + struct virt_dma_desc *vd = vchan_next_desc(&c->vc); > + > + if (vd) > + dma_cookie_complete(&vd->tx); > + } Why is start of the transfer deferred to the tasklet unless it is a periodic transfer? Couldn't it be started right away? > list_del_init(&c->node); > spin_unlock(&d->lock); > Sebastian From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bigeasy@linutronix.de (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 21:06:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/7] dmaengine: omap-dma: complete the transfer on terminate_all In-Reply-To: <1406660344-25307-3-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> References: <1406660344-25307-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <1406660344-25307-3-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> Message-ID: <53D7F0A4.2050301@linutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/29/2014 08:58 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/dma/omap-dma.c b/drivers/dma/omap-dma.c > index b19f04f..81ede01 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/omap-dma.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/omap-dma.c > @@ -970,6 +970,12 @@ static int omap_dma_terminate_all(struct omap_chan *c) > > /* Prevent this channel being scheduled */ > spin_lock(&d->lock); > + if (!c->desc && !list_empty(&c->node)) { > + struct virt_dma_desc *vd = vchan_next_desc(&c->vc); > + > + if (vd) > + dma_cookie_complete(&vd->tx); > + } Why is start of the transfer deferred to the tasklet unless it is a periodic transfer? Couldn't it be started right away? > list_del_init(&c->node); > spin_unlock(&d->lock); > Sebastian