All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] spin_lock_nested(): Always evaluate second argument
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 19:10:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E2618F.6040208@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53E260D9.6030803@acm.org>

Evaluating a macro argument only if certain configuration options
have been selected is confusing and error-prone. Hence always
evaluate the second argument of spin_lock_nested().

An intentional side effect of this patch is that it avoids that
the following warning is reported for netif_addr_lock_nested()
when building with CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=n and with W=1:

include/linux/netdevice.h: In function 'netif_addr_lock_nested':
include/linux/netdevice.h:2865:6: warning: variable 'subclass' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
  int subclass = SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING;
      ^

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
 include/linux/spinlock.h | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock.h b/include/linux/spinlock.h
index 3f2867f..485d5dc 100644
--- a/include/linux/spinlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/spinlock.h
@@ -197,7 +197,8 @@ static inline void do_raw_spin_unlock(raw_spinlock_t *lock) __releases(lock)
 		 _raw_spin_lock_nest_lock(lock, &(nest_lock)->dep_map);	\
 	 } while (0)
 #else
-# define raw_spin_lock_nested(lock, subclass)		_raw_spin_lock(lock)
+# define raw_spin_lock_nested(lock, subclass)		\
+	((void)(subclass), _raw_spin_lock(lock))
 # define raw_spin_lock_nest_lock(lock, nest_lock)	_raw_spin_lock(lock)
 #endif
 
-- 
1.8.4.5


  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-06 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-22  7:17 [PATCH RESEND] spin_lock_*(): Always evaluate second argument Bart Van Assche
2014-07-22 20:37 ` Andrew Morton
2014-07-22 23:16   ` David Rientjes
2014-08-06 17:07     ` Bart Van Assche
2014-08-06 17:10       ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2014-08-06 21:56         ` [PATCH v2] spin_lock_nested(): " David Rientjes
2014-08-08 10:32           ` Bart Van Assche
2014-08-08 10:35             ` [PATCH v3] " Bart Van Assche
2014-08-08 21:52               ` David Rientjes
2014-08-09  6:17                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-13 10:56               ` [tip:locking/core] locking/spinlocks: Always evaluate the second argument of spin_lock_nested() tip-bot for Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53E2618F.6040208@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.