From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] x86/viridian improvements Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 13:17:16 +0100 Message-ID: <53EA21EC020000780002B965@mail.emea.novell.com> References: <1407244035-25977-1-git-send-email-paul.durrant@citrix.com> <9AAE0902D5BC7E449B7C8E4E778ABCD0424793@AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net> <53EA0ACC020000780002B830@mail.emea.novell.com> <9AAE0902D5BC7E449B7C8E4E778ABCD042498A@AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <9AAE0902D5BC7E449B7C8E4E778ABCD042498A@AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Paul Durrant Cc: Ian Jackson , "Keir (Xen.org)" , Stefano Stabellini , IanCampbell , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 12.08.14 at 13:49, wrote: > In that case, I need acks from a Xen maintainer for all patches (Jan or > Keir), but patches #1 and #3 need acks from a toolstack maintainer (Stefano, > Ian J or Ian C). As you may have seen, patch 2 went in already. Since the core of the change is really in the hypervisor, I'm expecting to commit the series, and considering that among the people above it was mainly me having commented on the various versions plus you having taken care of all the issues I had pointed out, my going silent can also be interpreted as me just waiting for other comments/acks in order for the series to go in. But yes, from a formal perspective the hypervisor parts pf patches 1 and 3 are Acked-by: Jan Beulich Jan