From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xxiao8@fosiao.com>
Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118)
	id C1BADE00807; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	yocto-www.yoctoproject.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at
	http://www.dnswl.org/, low *      trust
	*      [209.85.218.46 listed in list.dnswl.org]
	* -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	*      [score: 0.0000]
Received: from mail-oi0-f46.google.com (mail-oi0-f46.google.com
	[209.85.218.46])
	by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13552E004F5
	for <meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>;
	Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-f46.google.com with SMTP id i138so6144166oig.5
	for <meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>;
	Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
	:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=4rSg5BhlTPWWpLuuwZ9x/g8FYiFsJXCcFGdOlqVPf8E=;
	b=TGt2BLGtgq0MTmKP961n4AbCJVDOhC41+1Fd8aC7VUjXT4D0RMf3iPmaab6lMkFtjV
	DW5S3Icebl/XsfKGhyL4bmyjjmNzt+7EXSspPE1TIMCzVb+4GEiHfX4R/XIEtayDJLbv
	NjdDGqiQ76DJC5QbMsPc3dx9u5ubbwMwA1rkBI3oJN7f9TZGIpL/zg0yU8jj/g6Asqns
	j17f7F9AeHjrzMT8f2tnCOkapK8Eyut8MB9FcOPImOlquHM94uflHOy/28cEv0lYEQ6V
	c/0Z7aAjU2+OLs66XW+h29eEd+SWWMDSHbtW4ir8EL/AdV+wq6KxezX5SYJf4ijBLZsK
	O46w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlT8IUJPOVtxN2eCJvPbOLSsArUDRwmNYa3bObAOH0nAuo1u/k0jFy4RBghpppc6TSa8XWi
X-Received: by 10.60.159.164 with SMTP id xd4mr51827468oeb.19.1408576315772;
	Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.90] (cpe-70-116-36-67.austin.res.rr.com.
	[70.116.36.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
	lk2sm26288092obc.15.2014.08.20.16.11.55 for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53F52B3B.5070209@fosiao.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 18:11:55 -0500
From: xxiao8 <xxiao8@fosiao.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
References: <53F4E509.1070509@fosiao.com>
	<CAP9ODKpLN0jpwS4F2_GHjU4RTk5hnciZidk+LQAPtfMSYC-03A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP9ODKpLN0jpwS4F2_GHjU4RTk5hnciZidk+LQAPtfMSYC-03A@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" <meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: i.MX 3.10.31-1.1.0_beta release - community feedback requested
X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers
	<meta-freescale.yoctoproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/options/meta-freescale>,
	<mailto:meta-freescale-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale>
List-Post: <mailto:meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:meta-freescale-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale>,
	<mailto:meta-freescale-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 23:12:03 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Just switched from digest mode to single email mode and waiting for 
whoever does the next vote, then I will have the thread to vote on...

xxiao

On 08/20/2014 02:41 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:12 PM, xxiao8 <xxiao8@fosiao.com> wrote:
>> I would have hoped Freescale stuck with 3.10.17 instead of 3.10.31 to make
>> 3.10.17 solid in the first place, unless 3.10.31 brought in something that
>> is a must-to-have I don't see the reason to make things unnecessarily
>> complicated. Customer can always patch to whatever 3.10.x when they want to
>> as those incremental patches are normally independent of Freescale's code
>> changes. Not to mention nowadays it's 3.10.53 now.
>>
>> Backport 3.10.31-beta to 3.10.17 and make this a gold release kernel is the
>> best option in my opinion. I again don't see the point to diverge at all.
> Please, if you want your vote to be considered do it in the another
> thread and inform your full name (as your name is not in from).
>