From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Valentine Sinitsyn <valentine.sinitsyn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Nested paging in nested SVM setup
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:38:01 +0600
Message-ID: <53F5E829.9050706@gmail.com>
References: <53A179C4.9060203@gmail.com> <53A18A6D.2050407@siemens.com> <53F44440.6070408@gmail.com> <53F44645.2000708@redhat.com> <53F45036.1070309@gmail.com> <53F45832.5080708@redhat.com> <53F59192.3070500@gmail.com> <53F5B250.3000206@gmail.com> <53F5D709.3060207@redhat.com> <53F5E5FF.90604@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com ([209.85.215.44]:64444 "EHLO
	mail-la0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752812AbaHUMiH (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 21 Aug 2014 08:38:07 -0400
Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id el20so8739613lab.3
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 05:38:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53F5E5FF.90604@gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 21.08.2014 18:28, Valentine Sinitsyn wrote:
> Also, I tried to use different register values for npt_l1mmio_test() and
> npt_l1mmio_check() (like 0xfee00030 and 0xfee00400), but got test passed
Just a small clarification: I made npt_l1mmio_test() to read 0xfee00030 
and npt_l1mmio_check() to compare against 0xfee00020 or 0xfee00400. No 
reason, just arbitrary values to check if anything compares non-equal in 
the check.

Valentine