From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Valentine Sinitsyn <valentine.sinitsyn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Nested paging in nested SVM setup
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 19:40:47 +0600
Message-ID: <53F5F6DF.1020305@gmail.com>
References: <53A179C4.9060203@gmail.com> <53A18A6D.2050407@siemens.com> <53F44440.6070408@gmail.com> <53F44645.2000708@redhat.com> <53F45036.1070309@gmail.com> <53F45832.5080708@redhat.com> <53F59192.3070500@gmail.com> <53F5B250.3000206@gmail.com> <53F5D709.3060207@redhat.com> <53F5E5FF.90604@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-la0-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:33316 "EHLO
	mail-la0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754404AbaHUNkw (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:40:52 -0400
Received: by mail-la0-f46.google.com with SMTP id b8so8771587lan.33
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 06:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53F5E5FF.90604@gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Sorry for the chain letters.

On 21.08.2014 18:28, Valentine Sinitsyn wrote:
> It passes for SVM, too.
I also looked at SVM tests more closely, and found out that NPT maps the 
whole memory-range as cached memory. This can also be a reason for a 
false positive in the test (if there is one). Will look into it later today.

Valentine