From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: performance save/restore under xen-4.3.2 compared
 to kvm/qemu
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 14:50:46 +0100
Message-ID: <53FB3F36.6020902@citrix.com>
References: <bb3b4b8ca1c15436997464e69f30c665@virt1.rossi.rhq>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <bb3b4b8ca1c15436997464e69f30c665@virt1.rossi.rhq>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: max ustermann <ustermann.max@web.de>, "xen-devel lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 25/08/14 14:35, max ustermann wrote:
>  Hi,
>
> first, thank you for the Information.
> For clearness i will comment, that i did the tests with an HVM Guest (Windows XP) not with an PV-Guest. Make this any diffenrence to your explanations?

Not at all.  My explanation still stands, especially the bit about 4
times faster.

>
> and then i would like to ask, are your modifications anywere avaible? are they in the unstable-tree of xen ????

I am working to try and get them included in Xen-4.5 before the code
freeze, but there is currently nothing in xen-unstable. 
Work-in-progress is available on my personal xenbits tree:

http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=people/andrewcoop/xen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/saverestore2-v6.1

~Andrew