From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 5/5] add xen pvscsi maintainer Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:12:16 +0100 Message-ID: <53FCBFF0.7050307__33008.9262839921$1409073314$gmane$org@citrix.com> References: <1408354310-6362-1-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com> <1408354310-6362-6-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com> <53FC962D.8070409@citrix.com> <53FC9855.1090908@suse.com> <1409071033.3812.13.camel@jarvis.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1409071033.3812.13.camel@jarvis.lan> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: James Bottomley , Juergen Gross Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, nab@linux-iscsi.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, hch@infradead.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, David Vrabel , JBeulich@suse.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 26/08/14 17:37, James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 16:23 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: >> On 08/26/2014 04:14 PM, David Vrabel wrote: >>> On 18/08/14 10:31, jgross@suse.com wrote: >>>> From: Juergen Gross >>>> >>>> Add myself as maintainer for the Xen pvSCSI stuff. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross >>>> --- >>>> MAINTAINERS | 8 ++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >>>> index aefa948..360f86f 100644 >>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS >>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >>>> @@ -10086,6 +10086,14 @@ S: Supported >>>> F: drivers/block/xen-blkback/* >>>> F: drivers/block/xen* >>>> >>>> +XEN PVSCSI DRIVERS >>>> +M: Juergen Gross >>>> +L: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org (moderated for non-subscribers) >>> >>> You should add the appropriate scsi list here >>> (linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org I presume?) >> >> Really? Xen PCI and Xen Block susbsystems don't have an according entry. >> James, do you have an opinion here? I don't mind adding linux-scsi, but >> I think the Xen list is the appropriate one for pvSCSI. > > It depends how you want to handle this, but the patches have to come on > to the SCSI list somehow. You can have them directly posted by adding > the list, or you can repost them yourselves. It's a question of > workflow. I think these drivers have had (and will continue to have) the most useful review from scsi people. I think posting directly (hence earlier) to linux-scsi will ensure the best quality. This is the workflow used for the Xen network drivers and I think it works well. David