From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Juergen Gross Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V5 5/5] add xen pvscsi maintainer Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 05:50:41 +0200 Message-ID: <53FD5591.2060308@suse.com> References: <1408354310-6362-1-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com> <1408354310-6362-6-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com> <53FC962D.8070409@citrix.com> <53FC9855.1090908@suse.com> <1409071033.3812.13.camel@jarvis.lan> <53FCBFF0.7050307@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <53FCBFF0.7050307@citrix.com> Sender: target-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Vrabel , James Bottomley Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, nab@linux-iscsi.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, hch@infradead.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, JBeulich@suse.com List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 08/26/2014 07:12 PM, David Vrabel wrote: > On 26/08/14 17:37, James Bottomley wrote: >> On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 16:23 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> On 08/26/2014 04:14 PM, David Vrabel wrote: >>>> On 18/08/14 10:31, jgross@suse.com wrote: >>>>> From: Juergen Gross >>>>> >>>>> Add myself as maintainer for the Xen pvSCSI stuff. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross >>>>> --- >>>>> MAINTAINERS | 8 ++++++++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >>>>> index aefa948..360f86f 100644 >>>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS >>>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >>>>> @@ -10086,6 +10086,14 @@ S: Supported >>>>> F: drivers/block/xen-blkback/* >>>>> F: drivers/block/xen* >>>>> >>>>> +XEN PVSCSI DRIVERS >>>>> +M: Juergen Gross >>>>> +L: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org (moderated for non-subscribers) >>>> >>>> You should add the appropriate scsi list here >>>> (linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org I presume?) >>> >>> Really? Xen PCI and Xen Block susbsystems don't have an according entry. >>> James, do you have an opinion here? I don't mind adding linux-scsi, but >>> I think the Xen list is the appropriate one for pvSCSI. >> >> It depends how you want to handle this, but the patches have to come on >> to the SCSI list somehow. You can have them directly posted by adding >> the list, or you can repost them yourselves. It's a question of >> workflow. > > I think these drivers have had (and will continue to have) the most > useful review from scsi people. I think posting directly (hence > earlier) to linux-scsi will ensure the best quality. > > This is the workflow used for the Xen network drivers and I think it > works well. Okay, I'll add the scsi list. Juergen