From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 18:45:20 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/8] sf: improve support of (Q)SPI flash memories In-Reply-To: References: <20170725070102.1344-1-wenyou.yang@microchip.com> <0576ef1a-1681-a2dc-6a2b-c30bb71d4737@Microchip.com> <7f5f8a98-7b8b-f16e-58a1-324e06980b5a@denx.de> Message-ID: <53a2419c-a85c-82ba-a4ee-059b2e6a1626@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 08/25/2017 06:28 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 08/25/2017 06:07 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:47 AM, Yang, Wenyou wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> This patch set has been here for a long time, could you have a look and take >>>> it? >>> >>> Yeah, I'm holding this because of my current spi-nor work. But anyway >>> I will try to merge on coming MW If all OK. >> >> Is your work posted somewhere or available in some git repository ? You did not answer this question. >> I don't see any reason why you should not perform your maintainer duties >> by reviewing/replying to an incoming patch, no matter what work you do >> to the subsystem though ... > > I didn't write "this series holding spi-nor work" since it has some > new features I'm taking time to review. I never implied this. Rather the opposite, you claim you do some work on the SPI NOR core, yet you let this patchset rot in the list for over a month now and gave the author zero feedback. Notifying the author about the core changes early could've prevented a lot of wasted effort on his side. Reviewing early could've prevented a lot of frustration from patches being ignored. > There is nothing wrong with > maintainer duties here, you must need to understand. I disagree. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut