From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.manjaro.org (mail.manjaro.org [116.203.91.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6A42101EB for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 10:09:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.91.91 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711966161; cv=none; b=jy+vokp+y0C1gSfJcybG8fMMOHjiZvfbMVXed6O0dPy+zg1m/kfoRuay5WaxCK4B0g0AB5kWjQdCZNEmIZK8EofJ0p8bqKAUM8+FUEGmLbwPzxpVpxEWK2nvY16w/KZr5KxKlYXYDzcBboUEW2EyE9ktD5v4+HOu1mzPss00uVc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711966161; c=relaxed/simple; bh=owbAWJTh8qQ2S0tIMe55XWKr2wK/TJwI7lOHLRVnbuI=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:From:To:Cc:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=IhYfs621+TYbdoUd/GIZtSq6HA6h8sNzkYf5qIKGVvD1muHYixwlwRg+xIRQY+lKxvbstsen8pz2oOxlPWdJSNgnfOKfNjn6CUNyOwjADn1f01IQ9DAurqzpww41A6XZ/eWTlbI30Dvx1SQrspWTLGpRZ6yJKyicj2Qq/YodLaA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b=H6nzgVvl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.91.91 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b="H6nzgVvl" Message-ID: <53b09f02-1422-405f-852f-02776fde19d1@manjaro.org> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manjaro.org; s=2021; t=1711966157; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dkbQG0JgQBaS0/cgc7cfRcHgIDa0PJBYGC4RDf8vMgQ=; b=H6nzgVvlBcqzCFu/X5behYchee1uf2t7QT18H/99DkaSLbtUn9jlG4iD9IFbrs+/9XZnGW LXTXtoDpWveLgwVrIrZYpilJkAgkKZK+hI2eY6z4L98UNPCVnxfEk4tDEjPAJPIqwc3iBC CM0Uox98Nnsu8JglPevsaqPZ+/wq5a1emo/XqrwUbXYW9vrNhwJYo7TximkSQBvvZW/U3m WP/zr/xtfRYI0PfiE9y1qKz+ntMcToae6n5jgJf9gSx4XVhDMmWdHwvguKcAfirjn2mpmI bNGYNO1XBncqLToflVyIE5Rz+NRKUNcxohyBBloIRqvKP5IL+JRc0jYK80SWBw== Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 17:09:11 +0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Regression] 6.8 - i2c_hid_acpi: probe of i2c-XXX0001:00 failed with error -110 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philip_M=C3=BCller?= To: Linux regressions mailing list , Hans de Goede Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , Kenny Levinsen References: <9a880b2b-2a28-4647-9f0f-223f9976fdee@manjaro.org> <2ae8b161-b0e6-404a-afab-3822b8b223f4@redhat.com> <122c6af1-b850-4c21-927e-337d9cef6d9c@redhat.com> <297c2412-5680-4a4f-bd43-b3431a0bb4bd@leemhuis.info> <349de395-0797-478d-9e04-860ebf423f4d@manjaro.org> Content-Language: en-US Organization: Manjaro Community In-Reply-To: <349de395-0797-478d-9e04-860ebf423f4d@manjaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=philm@manjaro.org smtp.mailfrom=philm@manjaro.org On 01/04/2024 13:43, Philip Müller wrote: > On 01/04/2024 13:20, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: >> TWIMC: Kenny Levinsen (now CCed) posted a patch to fix problems >> introduced by af93a167eda9: >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240331182440.14477-1-kl@kl.wtf/ >> >> Looks a bit (but I might be wrong there!) like he ran into similar >> problems as Philip, but was not aware of this thread. > > Hi Thorsten, > > thx for the pointer. I'm applying it right now and let you know if that > changes the situation on my device. Might be the right direction. > Seems I can confirm that the patch fixes the regression for me. I did batch test with reloading the module and no -110 errors anymore. We should add this patch also to 6.8+ kernels and backport if patches from that series should go to lower LTS kernels. -- Best, Philip