All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: pkey_alloc/pkey_free semantics
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 12:39:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53ca4117-3694-45ac-3433-c9d3456e096b@redhat.com> (raw)

I'm implementing the memory protection key interfaces for glibc and 
noticed that the pkey_alloc manpage in particular is a bit removed from 
reality.

Here's what I found:

The flags argument is reserved and currently must be zero.

The access_rights argument instructs the kernel to set the access rights 
for the new key for the current thread only (!).  It's a bitmask with 
bits PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS and PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE.

So in essence, both arguments are not needed right now because the 
access rights of the current thread for the new key could easily be 
changed in user space.

To repeat, pkey_alloc affects the access rights of the current thread. 
Other threads retain their existing access rights.  The default rights 
for the process apparently can be set with the init_pkru parameter on 
recent kernels (I have not tried that).

The manpage mentions only the key leak related to pkey_mprotect 
(pkey_free while a page still is still associated with that key).  There 
is another one which affects a pkey_alloc/pthread_create/pkey_free 
sequence, where any created threads retain their access rights.  I 
raised this issue of key reuse in a recent thread (MPK: pkey_free and 
key reuse), so perhaps there will be a way

Anyway, the important manpage fix for now would be to fix the 
description of the flags and access_rights parameters.

Thanks,
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

             reply	other threads:[~2017-11-05 11:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-05 11:39 Florian Weimer [this message]
     [not found] ` <53ca4117-3694-45ac-3433-c9d3456e096b-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-11-07 14:04   ` pkey_alloc/pkey_free semantics Florian Weimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53ca4117-3694-45ac-3433-c9d3456e096b@redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.