From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Razvan Cojocaru Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V11 2/5] xen: Optimize introspection access to guest state Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:41:12 +0300 Message-ID: <54071A78.7090702@bitdefender.com> References: <1409672239-19520-1-git-send-email-rcojocaru@bitdefender.com> <1409672239-19520-2-git-send-email-rcojocaru@bitdefender.com> <1409749606.23789.10.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <5407132E.5000405@bitdefender.com> <1409751529.23789.13.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <54071A17.9040904@bitdefender.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XPApD-0005sL-Qi for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 13:42:15 +0000 In-Reply-To: <54071A17.9040904@bitdefender.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, eddie.dong@intel.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, tim@xen.org, JBeulich@suse.com, jun.nakajima@intel.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 09/03/2014 04:39 PM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > On 09/03/2014 04:38 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: >> On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 16:10 +0300, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: >>> (in the meantime it's become [PATCH V2]). >> >> I saw, it was rather confusing to go from RFC v11 back to v1, v2 etc. >> Normally we would consider the RFC tags etc to be independent from the >> version (i.e. the version continues counting when tags are >> added/removed). I didn't know that. Would you like me to move to a higher number (which would that be now? 14?), or would that just add to the confusion at this point? Thanks, Razvan Cojocaru