From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from nm.newmedia-net.de ([217.113.179.122] helo=webmail.newmedia-net.de) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XR4y3-0005FX-4M for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 19:51:15 +0000 Message-ID: <540E0894.9080407@dd-wrt.com> Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 21:50:44 +0200 From: Sebastian Gottschall MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <540DD093.5070702@candelatech.com> In-Reply-To: <540DD093.5070702@candelatech.com> Subject: Re: RTS threshold ignored in ath10k? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: ath10k@lists.infradead.org Am 08.09.2014 um 17:51 schrieb Ben Greear: > We did some tests using ath9k and ath10k. It seems that ath10k > completely ignores RTS threshold settings. > > I haven't had time to look into the code yet, but will try to > do so next week. > > Thanks, > Ben > could you please also take a look into ack timing settings? right now its impossible for me to establish longer links with ath10k Sebastian _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k