From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751556AbaIJJOm (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 05:14:42 -0400 Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com ([195.59.15.196]:43660 "EHLO mailapp01.imgtec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751040AbaIJJOj (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 05:14:39 -0400 Message-ID: <5410167C.2070305@imgtec.com> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:14:36 +0100 From: Markos Chandras User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado CC: Greg KH , , , LKML , Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] MIPS: ioctls: Add missing TIOC{S,G}RS485 definitions References: <1410263575-26720-1-git-send-email-markos.chandras@imgtec.com> <20140909191736.GA7467@kroah.com> <54100AE5.6050401@imgtec.com> <54100FB0.1000308@imgtec.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [192.168.154.67] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/10/2014 10:05 AM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > Hello Markos > > Sorry for the mess. I have already send a new patch for mips using the > _IO* macros > > Just to put things a bit into context: > > I did made the patch for serial and tested it only in x86. I wrongly > infer that the IOCTLS were defined for all the arches (sorry :S) > > Then when the patch was applied on tty-next the build-bot throw some > errors for xtensa, that I fixed without using the IO_ macros > > Then you came with your patch, > > I realized that this could be wrong for mor arches, so I check the > rest and make patches for them. > > Greg then pointed out that I should use _IO instead of numbers, so I > remade my patches using the _IO macros. I did not want to step into > your patch so I did not prepare a new one for mips > > All the _IO patches (except mips) are now merged into tty-next. > > Hopefully that one also get merged soon :) > > > Thanks for your help and sorry for any disturbance. > > Hi Ricardo, No problem :) Thanks for taking care of that -- markos From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Markos Chandras Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] MIPS: ioctls: Add missing TIOC{S,G}RS485 definitions Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:14:36 +0100 Message-ID: <5410167C.2070305@imgtec.com> References: <1410263575-26720-1-git-send-email-markos.chandras@imgtec.com> <20140909191736.GA7467@kroah.com> <54100AE5.6050401@imgtec.com> <54100FB0.1000308@imgtec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado Cc: Greg KH , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On 09/10/2014 10:05 AM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > Hello Markos > > Sorry for the mess. I have already send a new patch for mips using the > _IO* macros > > Just to put things a bit into context: > > I did made the patch for serial and tested it only in x86. I wrongly > infer that the IOCTLS were defined for all the arches (sorry :S) > > Then when the patch was applied on tty-next the build-bot throw some > errors for xtensa, that I fixed without using the IO_ macros > > Then you came with your patch, > > I realized that this could be wrong for mor arches, so I check the > rest and make patches for them. > > Greg then pointed out that I should use _IO instead of numbers, so I > remade my patches using the _IO macros. I did not want to step into > your patch so I did not prepare a new one for mips > > All the _IO patches (except mips) are now merged into tty-next. > > Hopefully that one also get merged soon :) > > > Thanks for your help and sorry for any disturbance. > > Hi Ricardo, No problem :) Thanks for taking care of that -- markos