From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752844AbaIKJTl (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2014 05:19:41 -0400 Received: from david.siemens.de ([192.35.17.14]:41113 "EHLO david.siemens.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751053AbaIKJTj (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2014 05:19:39 -0400 Message-ID: <5411691D.5060103@siemens.com> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:19:25 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paolo Bonzini , Chris J Arges , kvm@vger.kernel.org CC: Gleb Natapov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: ioapic: add check for RTC_GSI References: <1410368033-23628-1-git-send-email-chris.j.arges@canonical.com> <54113AB2.3020801@siemens.com> <54116699.8080303@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <54116699.8080303@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2014-09-11 11:08, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 11/09/2014 08:01, Jan Kiszka ha scritto: >> That issue is limited to the dead ia64 architecture, no other builds >> ioapic.c (besides x86, of course). Maybe finally remove KVM support for >> that arch instead of bloating otherwise correct code? > > Yes, we should. I've just been too busy to do it. As I enjoy creating large negative diffs :), I would almost do it - if I had a test environment for IA64... Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux