From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753848AbaIKJfp (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2014 05:35:45 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:8762 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753770AbaIKJfn (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2014 05:35:43 -0400 Message-ID: <54116CE6.3090608@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:35:34 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kiszka , Chris J Arges , kvm@vger.kernel.org CC: Gleb Natapov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: ioapic: add check for RTC_GSI References: <1410368033-23628-1-git-send-email-chris.j.arges@canonical.com> <54113AB2.3020801@siemens.com> <54116699.8080303@redhat.com> <5411691D.5060103@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: <5411691D.5060103@siemens.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Il 11/09/2014 11:19, Jan Kiszka ha scritto: > On 2014-09-11 11:08, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 11/09/2014 08:01, Jan Kiszka ha scritto: >>> That issue is limited to the dead ia64 architecture, no other builds >>> ioapic.c (besides x86, of course). Maybe finally remove KVM support for >>> that arch instead of bloating otherwise correct code? >> >> Yes, we should. I've just been too busy to do it. > > As I enjoy creating large negative diffs :), I would almost do it - if I > had a test environment for IA64... I have one. :) Paolo